Russian Orthodox Church

Official website of the Moscow Patriarchate

Русская версияУкраинская версияМолдавская версияГреческая версияАнглийская версия
Patriarchate

Holy Synod states the impossibility of Eucharistic communion with Archbishop Chrysostomos of Cyprus

Holy Synod states the impossibility of Eucharistic communion with Archbishop Chrysostomos of Cyprus
Version for print
20 November 2020 year 16:59

On 20th November 2020, during its session, the Holy Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church considered the consequences that ensued from the commemoration by the Primate of the Orthodox Church of Cyprus of the schismatic structure acting in Ukraine (Minutes No. 77).

On 24th October 2020, during the Liturgy in the Monastery of the Most Holy Theotokos Chrysorrogiatissa near the city of Paphos, Archbishop Chrysostomos II of New Justiniana and All Cyprus commemorated the head of one of the schismatic groups in Ukraine in the diptychs of Primates of the autocephalous Orthodox Churches. Later Archbishop Chrysostomos admitted that he had not discussed his decision with the members of the Holy Synod of the Church of Cyprus and they had known nothing about the coming commemoration.

Metropolitans Athanasios of Limassol, Nikephoros of Kykkos, Isaiah of Tamassos and Nicholas of Amathounta issued a joint statement, condemning the Archbishop’s act as a “gross violation of the conciliar, collegial and democratic order of our Orthodox Church and of the way in which the Orthodox Church functions on the basis of this system,” and calling upon him “to cancel immediately his anti-canonical and invalid action.” The statement notes that the granting of “autocephaly” by the Patriarchate of Constantinople to the Ukrainian schismatics “is an arbitrary, uncanonical and anti-church action since the Ukrainian Orthodox Church is under the jurisdiction of the Moscow Patriarchate.”

Metropolitan Neophytos of Morphou said during his archpastoral meeting with the faithful of the Metropolis of Morphou, “Metropolitan Onufry was, is and, I hope, will remain the canonical bishop of the city of Kiev,” noting that even if the majority of bishops will support Archbishop Chrysostomos, “it will not make Yepifany a canonical hierarch.”

The participants in the session of the Holy Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church expressed their deep regret over the anti-canonical commemoration of the head of one of the Ukrainian schismatic groups in the diptychs of the Orthodox Primates, which indicates that Archbishop Chrysostomos entered into communion with schismatics.

As was emphasized during the meeting, Archbishop Chrysostomos took the aforementioned decision alone, without the agreement of the members of the Holy Synod of the Orthodox Church of Cyprus; therefore, the decision does not have conciliar nature.

It was taken into consideration that the Holy Synod of the Orthodox Church of Cyprus, at its session on 18th February 2019, chaired by Archbishop Chrysostomos, expressed lawful “doubts about a possibility to legitimatize post factum the ordinations performed by the defrocked, excommunicated and anathematized bishops,” meaning the “episcopate” of the newly created schismatic structure in Ukraine.

It was also noted that Archbishop Chrysostomos’ decision ran counter to his repeated official statements on the Ukrainian issue, in particular, to his letter of 26th July 2018, addressed to the Primate of the Russian Orthodox Church, in which the Archbishop of Cyprus gave the following assurances: “The Church of Cyprus will never deviate from her position, which we have set forth for you on many occasions, that is to say, we will use all our resources to support the position of the Russian Orthodox Church on the issue of the so-called autocephaly in Ukraine. She believes this position to be fair and wholly justified.” The Holy Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church stated the impossibility of commemorating the name of Archbishop Chrysostomos II of Cyprus in the diptychs, as well as of maintaining prayerful and Eucharistic communion with him and concelebrating with those hierarchs of the Church of Cyprus who would enter into ecclesiastical communion with representatives of the Ukrainian schism.

Patriarchia.ru/DECR Communication Service

Materials on the theme

Patriarch Kirill Gives Christmas Interview to Rossia TV [Patriarch : Interviews]

Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk: The Lord Has Entrusted Us With a Church That Has Existed for 1,000 Years [Interview]

‘OCU’ representatives make an assault on a church of the canonical Church in Chernovtsy region in Ukraine

Metropolitan Nikephoros of Kykkos and Tellyria on Archbishop of Cyprus’s recognition of head of the UOC: “We refuse to accept this decision because affects our faith”

Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk: the schism provoked by Constantinople is developing outside the folds of our Church

Holy Synod states the impossibility of Eucharistic communion with Archbishop Chrysostomos of Cyprus

The Contemporary Ukrainian Issue and Its Resolution according to the Divine and Sacred Canons by Nicephorus, metropolitan of Kykkos and Tillyria. Conclusions. [Article]

Representatives of Russian Ecclesiastical Mission congratulate Patriarch Theophilos of Jerusalem on the Nativity of Christ

His Holiness Patriarch Kirill and Primate of Orthodox Church in America hold telephone conversation

Syrian children receive presents from Russia on St. Nicholas commemoration day

Archpriest Andrei Novikov: crocodile tears of Phanar hierarch [Article]

ЖУРНАЛЫ заседания Священного Синода от 29 декабря 2020 года [Documents]

Bishops’ Council of the Russian Orthodox Church to take place in November 2021

His Holiness Patriarch Kirill chairs Holy Synod’s last session in 2020

His Holiness Patriarch Kirill chairs Holy Synod’s last session in 2020

Patriarch Kirill Gives Christmas Interview to Rossia TV [Patriarch : Interviews]

Archpriest Andrei Novikov: crocodile tears of Phanar hierarch [Article]

Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk: The Lord Has Entrusted Us With a Church That Has Existed for 1,000 Years [Interview]

Metropolitan Hilarion: Constantinople’s papist claims are groundless [Interview]